|
|
|
|
 |
|
This engine is the smallest six-inch stroke US Navy compound, with
dimensions of 3.5 + 7 x 6 stroke. This engine is an important
find, as it is complete and un-restored, unlike any we have ever
seen. Most often old engines are found lacking parts, or they
have been mechanically spoiled by the well-intentioned "restorer"
who takes every piece apart to clean and polish it, but who is unable
to re-assemble with all surfaces properly aligned because he has
scraped away pesky shims or bedding. This relic is coated
in varnished oil, and the owner who "moth-balled" it some
unknown years ago in Alaska had the forsight to cover the exhaust
port. This engine even has the brass cylinder top covers and
Bureau of Steam Engineering engraved plate.
This
engine is small enough to be installed in an Elliott Bay hull, even
though it is more suitable for a larger hull, such as the 28-foot
cutter, were one to exist. Send $5. and we will send you a
print of the US Navy 28-foot Steam Cutter, taken from Standard Designs
for Boats of the US Navy, 1900.
We recommend Keith Sternberg
and Stewart Marshall or Lopez, Washington, to restore this engine,
since they are experts with experience rebuilding marine engines,
including US Navy M and G engines, and larger compounds and triples.
Sale of this engine is
on hold, pending the decision to use this engine in a replica US
Navy cutter. |
|
|
|
  |
|
.
Beaumaris apprentices won the national apprenticeboys award with
this engine. Hugh Jones, director of Beaumaris Instrument
Company believed in apprentice training, requiring each to learn
his trade and his shop methods by building his pet product, a faithful
replica of a true 19th century marine engine. Three sets of
ten engines each were built, so we understand, and each to Jones'
exacting old fashioned methods. As good as an original, this
engine was the ultimate in 1970s when it was made. No one
has made such an elaborate production engine since the old days.
This engine was motorized
for display; the brass cowls cover belt pulleys at each end.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Imagine 8 hp from a compound marine engine
turning 800 rpm--but that's what the Simpson-Strickland catalog says! |
|
|
1.75 + 2.75 + 4. + 6 x
3.5 stroke |






|
|
Simpson-Strickland Quadruple
Expansion Marine Engines, otherwise known as "Kingdon Compounds,"
are among the most interesting and soughtafter original launch engines.
The hope, in 1878, when the design was patented, was that four expansions
would extract all the energy from the steam. The engine has
symmetry: two tandem compounds, the second using the exhaust of
the first. At 175 lbs. boiler presure the company claimed 10 indicated
HP, and at 250 lbs., 14 HP. At these high pressures the engines
suffered wear and were noisy, but the company's goal was high speed,
and in 1878 speed won sales in a competative market for small power
boats.
Operating these engines
at more moderate pressures and speeds makes them the most pleasant
of marine engines. In a 23-foot launch that requires but 4 HP to
go 7 knots, they are the ultimate in Victorian era boat engines.
We mimicked Simpson-Strickland's "Kingdon" boiler, but
in modern materials and practice, and now have these available in
ASME code.
So, if you are looking
for the ultimate, we can supply you with machinery, hull, and accessories.
Until 1994 when we bought
the engine above (and on left in adjacent image), we had seen these
only in photographs, or in the London Science Museum. Only
two were operating at the time, one in UK and the other in Germany,
and only a handful of others had survived. Our engine sat
under the bench awaiting our chance to view an original, so we could
give the relic a proper conservation jod, such as to replicate its
wood lagging, its builder's plate, lubricators, etc.
.
Then, ten years later,
an antique marine gasoline engine collector wanted one of our hulls,
and offered a trade for "an old marine steam engine."
His engine turned out to be the same model, just eighteen
serial numbers apart, ours made in 1889 and his made 1890.
Both were missing parts, but what one lacked, the other had.
Most important, the second engine had its wood lagging, in shambles
condition but sufficiently intact for restoration. The other
engine also appears to have its original paint over the bronze frame,
and "red lead" over the cylinder casting.
Simspon-Strickland went
to lengths to keep one from easily copying its pumps. We know;
we tried. A clever foundryman can often make a one-off copy,
even of a complex part, by careful work at his core bench--but not
so with these apparently simple, but deceptively complex parts. The
left feed pump is the original, and the right
pump is the copy, still not completely machined. The red pump
is the condensate pump, of the standard Hoskins design with dashpot
valve and head valve.
Engine pumps are rarer
than engines. I suspect three reasons for this: 1) they were
easy targets for a scrap sale, 2) they were off being fixed when
the owner succumbed to the purchase of a modern oil or gas engine,
and 3) they got separated at the time of the engine's sale.
The pumps can be in parts in a bucket, just a foot away, but be
missed when the engine is crated for shipment--this we have learned
the hard way.
The Simpson-Strickland
pumps were continually changed; each engine model different. Either
they all did not work very well--or defeated the engineer that did
not pay them maintenance attention--or they were each purpose-built
to match the feedwater needs of each particular. Delicate balance
considering ruggedness required and the tight range of service to
keep the engine at equilibrium.
The B&W image is from
Simpson-Strickland's catalog No. 4, printed soon after 1890.
Below is a photo of a complete Kingdon Compound.
We will add images of
the engine and its replicated parts as we progress.
|
|
|
(2.25 + 4.75 x 3.5) |



|
|
We
presume this is is the old style 10 HP compound, as referred to
in the Liquid Fuel Engineering Co. 1896 Catalog. Its height
from bottom side of bedplate bearers to top surface of cylinder
block is 20 inches; length is 25.5 inches; width (determined by
pumps) is 20 inches. Port side pump rod is .930-inches diameter;
Starboard is .950-inches diameter; stroke 2.5 inches. We hope
to find an original burner and boiler for this engine because LIFU
machinery is truly is a marvel of innovation, if only because mineral
oil fuel. LIFU appear to be the first to say their engines
are manufactured with interchangeable parts.
We welcome any further
information that others may offer. Any information or spare
parts out there, anyone? The pumps shown came from a different
engine, yet their fastener bolt holes align the shaft drives.
However, all LIFU pumps could have had a
universal bolt pattern.
Does anyone know if this is the correct pump set for this engine?
Notice the LIFU's telescoping
crosshead bearing oilers in the image of the crossheads.
We are reluctant to sell
this engine until we learn if the remainder of the system's parts
can be found. Are there any complete LIFUs in service? |
|
|
|


|
|
The
restored US Navy M is at Sternberg & Marshalls' shop, photographed
with Sternberg making final assembly. Damage that it suffered during
Katrina prompted a much-needed overhaul that included the removal
of saltwater damage, crankshaft straightening & grinding, bearing
realignment, etc. The polished brass & steel and paint
was only incidental to the fundamental work required. This
M is the main engine for MASCOT, owned by Alex Ellsworth of Louisiana,
and is not for sale, but pictured here to show a restored Navy engine,
as well as to show Sternberg's & Marshall's work.
The unrestored US Navy
M is at our shop, available to anyone who is planning a small yacht.
It is missing its reversing lever and quagrant, but we have
the original Navy prints for the entire engine, including these
parts. We recommend to whoever purchases the engine to take
it to Sternberg & Marshall to investigate its needs prior to
its service.
Yes, the bedplate is bronze!
And made from a complex, multi-core casting that only navy spending
could pay for! |
 |
|
Mumford
Compound, Size No. 1
(2.25 + 4.5 x
3.25)
Finally, we accurately
identified this engine. Once we had the larger Momford on
our floor, the similarities prompted a closer look at the Mumford
literature. (We had called it a generic "Thames River"
compound because of its small size and the likely waters of its
original use.) Slide valves, both HP & LP, Robey-type
crossheads with screw take-up on wristpins; insulation jacket underside
of cylinder block, pumps not originally fitted, finely machined
and fitted. |
|
|
|
 |
|
This
well-preserved compound could have been almost anywhere. It is illustrated
in 1912 catalog of A. G. Mumford, Ltd., "Contractors to the
Admiralty, War Office, India Office, Crown Agents for the Colonies,
Spanish, Italian, Japanese, Brazilian, and other Navies."
Engine weight 8 cwt; Propeller
diameter 33.5inches, Boiler hearing surface 94sq. ft;Grate surface
8sq. ft.; Indicated HP 30; Weight of machinery under steam 48cwts.
Attached is an image of the engine from Mumford's Catalog, page
5. |
| |
|
|
This page from Momford's 1912 Catalog shows an independent thrust bearing
on the tail shaft with this engine. The 6-inch stroke engine was delivered
with a boiler with grate area of 8 sq. feet, diameter of 3'7" and height
of 3'9" weighing 2925 lbs.
|
|